-
DocumentRogers, J., and K. vanden Heuvel. Metropolis Now. New Statesman, 2009.
-
Hudson, G., J. Rogers, and P. Thompson. Eyes on the Prize: Program Architecture of Emerald Cities. COWS, 2008.
This memo offers suggestions on program architecture for a national effort to build “emerald” cities, shorthand for high-road cities committed to greening their economies in equitable and democratically accountable ways.
Document -
Dresser, L., and J. Rogers. State of Working Wisconsin 2008. COWS, 2008.
The State of Working Wisconsin 2008, a biennial report on how the state and its workers are faring. Documents include Full Report and Summary.
Document Document -
Luria, D., and J. Rogers. “Manufacturing, Regional Prosperity, and Public Policy”. Retooling for Growth: Building a 21st Century Economy in America’s Older Industrial Areas, Brookings Institution Press, 2008, pp. 249-74.
Chapter 9 in Retooling for Growth: Building a 21st Century Economy in America’s Older Industrial Areas, Richard M. McGahey and Jennifer S. Vey editors.
Assume that we want an economy of shared prosperity, good jobs, and the competitive practices that sustain them. We want that in all conceivable sectors of the economy. Why not in manufacturing?
Document -
Mitnik, P., J. Halpern-Finnerty, and M. Vidal. Cities and Immigration: Local Policies for Immigrant-Friendly Cities. COWS, 2008.
This report aims at helping elected officials, policy-makers, activists, community-based organizations and city residents advocate for, design and implement progressive city policies toward immigrants. These goals have become particularly important given the recent failures of comprehensive immigration reform initiatives at the federal level. Building on policy experiments and experiences from all around the country, the report offers a menu of local policies aimed at creating immigrant-friendly cities.
Document -
DocumentRogers, J., and J. Cohen. “How’re We Doing: Reflecting on Moral Progress in America”. The Good Society, Vol. 17, no. 1, 2008, pp. 13-19.
-
,. The State of Working Wisconsin 2007 Update. COWS, 2007.
Provides a thorough review of jobs, wages, poverty, income, and job quality in the state on a bi-annual basis.
Document -
Madison, Wisconsin, July 3, 2007 – A new report from the Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS), Corporate Tax and Subsidy Disclosure: Policy Options for Wisconsin, highlights policy weaknesses and proposes a new tax and subsidy disclosure policy that would affect all publicly-traded corporations (“C” corporations) and their subsidiaries doing business in the state.
After reviewing other states’ current and proposed tax disclosure plans, the new COWS report recommends that Wisconsin adopt a policy requiring these companies to disclose, at a minimum, how much they pay in taxes to the state, how much business they do in the state, and how much financial help they get from the state. This information would then be made available to the public in a searchable database.
“This level of transparency is key for policymakers and the public to better evaluate the tax system and see if it is truly working in the economic interests of the state,” said Kate Gordon, lead author of the report and senior associate at COWS.
The report points to Illinois as an important example. Illinois has enacted one of the nation’s most comprehensive corporate subsidy disclosure laws. The 2003 Illinois Corporate Accountability Act requires companies receiving any number of state economic development dollars to report on their progress in achieving job creation, retention and wage promises made in subsidy deals.
“Illinois has developed a database that allows the policymakers and public to understand what investments the state is making,” Gordon said. “Something like this is feasible and realistic for Wisconsin as well.”
Additional transparency would benefit Wisconsin’s businesses as well, because it could lead to a fairer tax system. The fairer tax system would allow companies that shoulder their full tax burden under existing laws to be more competitive with those companies taking advantage of unfair tax loopholes and unchecked subsidies.
As the report points out, exposing the current tax and subsidy system to public scrutiny may well lead to fewer tax loopholes, and in turn to increased corporate tax revenues. The end result is more money flowing to state programs such as workforce training, education, infrastructure and other public resources that are highly valued by firms – more highly valued, by most accounts, than low taxes.
Corporate Tax and Subsidy Disclosure: Policy Options for Wisconsin, can be found online at: www.cows.org/pdf/rp-corp-tax.pdf.
Document -
Mitnik, P. Cities and Jobs: Local Strategies for Improving Job Quality and Access. 2007.
What can cities do to improve the quality of jobs? How can cities boost the access of the disadvantaged to the good jobs available in their jurisdictions? Building from policy innovations and experiences from all around the country, this report offers a menu of city policies aimed at improving job quality and redistributing job opportunities in favor of the disadvantaged.
Document -
Gordon , K., and K. Hanniman. Corporate Tax and Subsidy Disclosure: Policy Options for Wisconsin. COWS, 2007.
COWS report highlights policy weaknesses and proposes a new tax and subsidy disclosure policy that would affect all publicly-traded corporations (“C” corporations) and their subsidiaries doing business in the state.
Document